Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Life Sci Alliance ; 5(12)2022 08 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1994892

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect individuals with haematologic malignancies against severe COVID-19, while eliciting limited vaccine responses. We characterized the humoral responses following 3 mo after mRNA-based vaccines in individuals at different plasma-cell disease stages: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), and multiple myeloma on first-line therapy (MM), compared with a healthy population. Plasma samples from uninfected MM patients showed lower SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels and neutralization capacity compared with MGUS, SMM, and healthy individuals. Importantly, COVID-19 recovered MM individuals presented significantly higher plasma neutralization capacity compared with their uninfected counterparts, highlighting that hybrid immunity elicit stronger immunity even in this immunocompromised population. No differences in the vaccine-induced humoral responses were observed between uninfected MGUS, SMM and healthy individuals. In conclusion, MGUS and SMM patients could be SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated following the vaccine recommendations for the general population, whereas a tailored monitoring of the vaccine-induced immune responses should be considered in uninfected MM patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance , Paraproteinemias , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/pathology , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
2.
Rev Invest Clin ; 73(4): 259-264, 2021 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1498287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have clinical features including older age, presence of medical comorbidities, susceptibility to infections, and thrombotic tendencies which are relevant when assessing their risk during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To study the vulnerability of patients with MGUS during the COVID-19 pandemic, we assessed the local management of MGUS patients and their clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed for all patients with MGUS seen at a university medical center clinic (2014-2020). RESULTS: A total of 228 MGUS patients were included; 211 patients are alive, 7 patients died before the pandemic, and 10 patients died since the pandemic declaration. The mean age and the overall survival (OS) of the patients who died before versus during the pandemic were 83.0 versus 75.2 years, p = 0.4, and OS 40.6 versus 53.2 months, p = 0.3, respectively. One patient died of COVID-19. Nine patients had venous thromboembolisms (VTE), all of which occurred before the pandemic onset. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences found in the mean age or OS of the MGUS patients who died before versus after the pandemic onset. An increase in VTE rates was not seen. Study results are limited by small patient numbers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Academic Medical Centers , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/epidemiology , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Vulnerable Populations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL